#Rural #Wisconsin #Counties > Lose #Population > Lack of #GOP #Walker Investment in #Education Infrastructure
In general it would be interesting to see aggregate numbers broken down by State Assembly and Senate districts. After all, constituents should be interested in how their own locality fairs. Does Walker and GOP public policy and taxation benefit them, harm them or treat the "district" in a "neutral" manner by per capita or with other denominators?
I speculate that most of the Walker and GOP "taxation suppression" and "property tax cuts" benefit-wise do not flow to the rural and small community, poor county but rather disproportionately to wealthy counties by virtue high-income counties. In other words the richer get richer.
Not the two you might think (2010) .. Walker's benefits probably flow mostly here ...
The three at the bottom ...
Katherine Cramer Discusses Her New Book
This was the Walker narrative used to torpedo high speed train infrastructure --
“You’ve got a world driven by Madison, and a world driven by everybody else out across the majority of the rest of the state of Wisconsin,” said Walker on Wednesday at a capitol press conference. (April 7, 2011)
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/264130/madison-vs-rest-wisconsin-christian-schneider
Gov. Walker Resumes His War on Workers By THE EDITORIAL BOARD FEB. 20, 2016 NYTimes
12/26/2015 ... Be aware - anytime Walker takes something away from one group, say your School Board, County Board, Teachers or state employees he is lowering the common denominator. Others not in those groups have less control of their lives. Your benefits or privileges are affected too.
I don't doubt plenty of people have trouble, especially in rural areas, paying their property tax bill. That is a problem the "Homestead Tax Credit" was designed to alleviate in Wisconsin - does it need expansion? Many rural areas also lack social infrastructure as well as physical infrastructure.
Why would a family with children want to move to or live in a place with no schools and little immediate access to health care. Why would a retired person want to live there either - they may be stuck and getting to a doctor is really a major problem? Why would someone growing up there, spending most of their time being bused to school, want to stay there when later they can't get a job; when they can go to a larger community get a job, meet other people their age, and have more of a social life?
Wisconsin Self-Insurance is likely to decimate healthcare alternatives for all citizens in rural areas.
The Atlantic (3/17): Red State, Blue City The United States is coming to resemble two countries, one rural and one urban. What happens when they go to war?
But if liberal advocates are clinging to the hope that federalism will allow them to create progressive havens, they’re overlooking a big problem: Power may be decentralized in the American system, but it devolves to the state, not the city. Recent events in red states where cities are pockets of liberalism are instructive, and cautionary. Over the past few years, city governments and state legislatures have fought each other in a series of battles involving preemption, the principle that state law trumps local regulation, just as federal law supersedes state law. It hasn’t gone well for the city dwellers.
WI 1848 Forward: "The Politics of Resentment" = #Walker = #Trump political rise == #rural resentment of "liberals"
WI 1848 Forward: "The Politics of Resentment" = #Walker political rise == #rural misdirected resentment> "liberals"
#1% #Elite Irony " #Politics of Resentment" = #Walker political rise == #rural resentment against #urban
State of the Union #Elite Irony" #Politics of Resentment" = #Walker political rise == #rural resentment vs #urban
WI 1848 Forward: "The Politics of Resentment" = #Trump #Walker fools the #rural #elderly > helps the wealthy #1%